Real Ways To Make Money At Home
An Alternative Approach to Buying a Home or Investing in Real Estate
Group buying for housing, Group buy homes, Group buy real estateHome production remains stuck in Levittown. Mass production techniques are used, but the speculative build model remains, creating unnecessary risk for the builder. Buyers, meantime, pay higher prices than they would if they had been organized in groups to secure discounts. Alternative strategies involving social cooperation have emerged in the form form of Intentional Communities, Co-Housing, and massive buying groups in China.
Sign Up for Group Buys at Get Grouby
A group buying approach is coming soon at Get Grouby.com. Sign up and follow our progress as we first launch local services.
Home Production Stuck in Levittown
Home purchase and sale remains stuck in the Levittown model of production. It was William Levitt, who first applied assembly-line techniques to housing construction, producing the first mass produced suburb. Prior to Levitt, the American housing industry was not so much an industry as a loose affiliation of local builders, any one of whom completed an average of four houses a year. Housing is unique and unlike nearly every product produced and consumed: it has remained beyond the purview of volume buying and discounts. And through lax lending and Wall Street securitization of mortgages, it has become an investment fraught with price volatility and risk. Still sold on a one to one basis, buyers have failed to form collective action for their own benefit. They negotiate alone, deprived of leverage that exits had they organized as a group. With regard to production builders, buyers compete with others over a product of marginal or inessential differences. Most builders have only a few different models to choose from. The monotony of suburban tract homes is testament to this lack of product differentiation.
In order to create consumer discounts, reduce risk and create product innovation, a new process is needed. Collaborative buying groups enabled via the internet or through traditional group meetings promises to be an evolution of this marketplace. At this time, I believe a necessary one for buyers and sellers to create a more risk averse and efficient system. In large scale planned unit developments and condominium projects, a common practice in pre-construction sales has been based on spec plans and visual mock ups alone, oftentimes secured only by a developers promise to build and sometimes mere options on proposed building sites. In strong markets, this method has consistently succeeded in jump starting new development projects. While providing discounts to early buyers in new communities, once sales targets are reached, discounts are phased out with later buyers paying substantial premiums. While higher prices charged to subsequent buyers are intrinsic to developer profits, they slow sales, putting the completion of the project at risk, highlighting the risk taken by pre-construction buyers. The result of this process has created two classes of homeowners, each with distinct issues: 1) Early buyers risk losing deposits and shoulder execution risk on the part of the developer. 2) Subsequent buyers that overpay relative to early purchasers. In normal markets, after transaction costs, these buyers must endure years of holding this asset in order to generate a profit on their purchase. When finally selling their property, they will likely be undercut by early stage buyers that have already locked in a profit. When the benefits of home ownership are described, missing from this discussion are the calculated risks taken by individual purchasers in this atomized system. Early stage investors shoulder too much risk while late stage buyers too often overpay. Pre-construction sales are merely a half-step to a system that puts consumers in charge of a process to mitigate their own risks while allowing more decision making and control on behalf of buyers. For planned communities and condominiums, a group buying system that aggregates purchasers into groups for the total sale of the project on behalf of buyers would create a more efficient and cost effective distribution model than the present one where only a percentage of the units are pre-sold by the developer. Execution risk mounts as the developer seeks to maximize profits during sell out. In strong markets, the developer may maintain margins of 15 to 50%. In the world of Wal-Mart and the internet, those margins are not only healthy but obscene and are a consequence of the system fraught with execution risk, market uncertainty and dependance on third party capital. In lean times, the speculative build model exposes builder's balance sheets, causing high risk of bankruptcy even among the most tenured and stable firms. On November 9, 2007, Levitt and Sons of Fort Lauderdale (the innovator of the production build model) became the nation's largest builder ever to file for bankruptcy, highlighting the systemic risks of the production build model in housing. Owner Builder Networks offer a way out of this dilemma. However, buyers remain isolated and are denied the economies of scale enjoyed by production builders. Buyers may save money by carrying the construction loan in their name (a lending hurdle many buyers cannot overcome) and by becoming their own general contractor (an occupational challenge and prohibitively time consuming event for most of us). Some of the benefits for the group buying of homes:
For buyers
-
Know your neighbor before you buy (if a local community group).
-
Community co-creation based on consumer choice, not developer profit.
-
Choice in dealing directly with architects, contractors, and or developers for customization not achievable by traditional means.
-
Mitigate or eliminate developer profits and lower cost of acquisition.
-
Create park, pool and green space based on real demand and not by perception and budget of the developer.
-
HOA formed and controlled by buyers from the beginning (this makes it easier to getting Fannie Mae project approval for competitive mortgages).
-
Modification of property outside of traditional boundaries (i.e. granny shacks, in home businesses, common buildings for neighborhood child care, meals, etc.)
-
Aesthetic novelty and improvement
-
Improvement and choice in building materials
-
Choice in ecologically friendly location, construction materials, energy sources.
For Developers and Construction companies
-
Reservations and sales may be made prior to significant money invested. Activity on posted projects serves as a proxy for studies, eliminating need for feasibility studies or "testing" the market.
-
Use credit capacity of buyers in place of your builder credit lines or third-party investors (very important smaller builders).
-
Market behavior based on real demand and not speculation (no need for "specs").
A group buying system promises several levels of participation:
-
Group with others to approach builders and bank REO departments to negotiate volume discounts. Current large inventories of builder spec homes, condos and foreclosures will allow for substantial discounts from list price. Builders with large inventories of spec homes and condos and will be best targets to approach for volume discounts. REO departments, traditionally accustomed to negotiating with single, large investors will make similar adjustments to accommodate large buying groups. This process may restrict choice and will likely be dominated by consumers and investors interested in lower prices and a higher return on investment. However, after purchase, buyers may form a secondary market to swap homes with others to achieve the home of their choice, provided their first choice was not attained through the initial group buying pool.
-
Group with others to build entire plan from raw land to finish product. Buyers start at the beginning and negotiate and select the initial option to purchase land, similar to a developer. The group determines site selection, street layout, green space, size, number, and design of units. This process may be dominated by those groups that want novelty in design, use, and structure. Price may be a secondary consideration. But again, cooperation and consensus building is key.
-
Comment: Our current system of production style homebuilding has emasculated architects and designers, while emboldening large corporations that build oftentimes wasteful, oversized tract home communities, disconnected to cities and work (sprawl). Social cooperation in property development and construction may create new relationships to space, new building patterns and opportunities for public space and authentic socialization. Over the past generation, the family size has gotten smaller while the house size has grown larger. The current foreclosure market demonstrates that too many buyers bought larger houses than they could afford. This is due not only to subprime and adjustable rate mortgages, but the social logic of competitive consumption. It creates waste as consumers attempt to outdo their neighbors. Perhaps more importantly, as material affluence spreads to India, China, Russia, Brazil and elsewhere, the structural logic of competitive consumption could tragically end as the resource base to support the American style of affluence is proving to be unsustainable.
Improved Pricing Model - Group Buy
Builder Vs. Group Buy Price CurvesGoogle Presentation A cooperative or group model for the purchase of housing mitigates risk for both home buyers and builders, as purchasers form groups to sell out their own projects. In this model, everyone pays the same price based on a pro-rata portion of the final project. By contrast, the pricing in the spec built production model, buyers negotiating independently with a builder over a long period of time - your price depends primarily upon timing (phase of the project) and your negotiating ability with the builder. Alternative Models to Developer Driven Housing Construction New models of residential property development patterned upon group consensus and cooperation are already in practice and are successful. In the United States and Europe, pre-fabricated housing offers an alternative but still needs the benefit of high volume buying to proliferate and leverage true factory style mass production. In China, a massive groups are forming to buy affordable homes in Shenzen. A collaborative approach exists today in the United States and Europe, but is operating under restrictive ideological banners (Intentional communities) and definitive building patterns based on a Danish concept called Co-housing. It is my belief that in the future homebuyers will form groups on a basis common to everyone: to save money and to create more options for themselves.Group Buying for Pre-Fabricated Housing
Pre-fabricated housing follows the typical production and retailing model to which the majority of consumer goods conform. Lowes, for example, now sells prefab homes as Sears did many years ago. IKEA is offering prefabricated homes in Europe. To create options with other designers and avoid the retail middleman, group buying strategies should prove highly effective in lowering purchase costs for pre-fab home buyers. When buying groups are localized, group buying should lower costs of contractor installation.
Here the traditional prices curves associated with higher sales volumes that are enjoyed by other consumer goods sectors should be passed to buying groups. Because of higher cost and higher profit margins enjoyed by home producers relative to other industries, dramatic savings may result. As important, since every pre-fab home ordered already has a buyer, the developer driven speculative build model is eliminated. As a result, prices have greater stability and lower foreclosure rates are likely to result when buying manufactured and prefabricated homes.
Contemporary manufactured and pre-fabribricated homes offer more variety and construction quality than in the past. The 140 mph wind ratings of Marianne Cusato's Katrina Cottages is testament to the strength and quality of today's pre-fabricated housing. Both traditional and modernist architectural is now available in manufactured housing. Pre-fab modernist designs have provided an affordable way to deliver modernist aesthetics not met in the project or tract house building model. Unfortunately, outside of the Katrina Cottages offered by Lowes, no other large distributors are buying in bulk to help bring costs down.
Many innovative designer-manufactures exist with many more in various stages of planning. Rocio Romero's LV home is an attractive and affordable option that is manufactured from a facility in Perryville, Missouri. A Seattle based company called Place Houses recently launched a mass production model of high end designs. But sill missing from this high end manufactured home model are the economies of scale offered by larger distribution. Because the high cost of the product and large potential numbers of purchases, I believe large savings could be achieved via online group buying practice as opposed to traditional bulk buying and distribution via retail channels.
Zau Tao's Group Buy Project in Shenzen
Over the past few years, China witnessed an even more dramatic price rise than many parts of the United States. As a result, major cities in China have become unaffordable. In 2005, consumer activist and Shenzen resident, Zou Tao gained notoriety for organizing a "Not Buy House" campaign to help curb speculation. Today, he has started a new initiative to called "Housing for Ten Thousand - Group Buying Activity." Mr. Tao has established a web site at www.zoutao.com. Online registration has already started and appears he appears to be off to an impressive start. Zau Tao has organized group buying to assist homebuyers in Shenzen achieve discounts by pushing down home prices. There appears to a number of projects offered and plenty of activity on his website. Team buying is already very popular for electronic items in China and now this model has proved attractive in housing. In the United States, venture capital firms had not invested in this space since 1999 when Mercata and Mobshop gave group buying a try with low margin electronic items already bought in bulk Wal-Mart, Best Buy, etc.Co-Housing and Intentional Communities
Intentional communities are planned residential communities designed to promote a much higher degree of social interaction than other communities. The members of an intentional community typically hold a common social, political or spiritual vision. They also share responsibilities and resources. Intentional communities include cohousing, residential land trusts, ecovillages, communes, kibbutzim, ashrams, and housing cooperatives. Typically, new members of an intentional community are selected by the community's existing membership, rather than by real-estate agents or land owners (if the land is not owned by the community).
A Cohousing community is a kind of intentional community composed of private homes with full kitchens, supplemented by extensive common facilities. A cohousing community is planned, owned and managed by the residents, groups of people who want more interaction with their neighbors. Common facilities vary but usually include a large kitchen and dining room where residents can take turns cooking for the community. Other facilities may include a laundry, pool, child care facilities, offices, internet access, game room, TV room, tool room or a gym. Through spatial design and shared social and management activities, cohousing facilitates intergenerational interaction among neighbors, for the social and practical benefits. There are also economic and environmental benefits to sharing resources, space and items.
Cohousing is not the product of a single ethos or social movement, although individual groups might share a desire for a more cohesive multi-family design and ample common space, for example, or an appreciation of deep ecology and community activism. Instead it grew out of a desire on the part of working families, single professionals and senior citizens for a greater sense of community, as more people moved away from traditional neighborhoods and towns and from single-family households.![]() |
Changing role of the Developer
The Developer, as an intermediary and a generalist, will likely experience a reduced role in the process described. The production builder sales model still flourishes on inessential differences in product and the isolation of the buyer to individual transactions, making the production builder vulnerable to alternative processes that lower dependency on intermediares. Aside from bulk buying clubs organized for investor discounts for preconstruction condos, buyers (particularly owner occupants) have thus far lacked methods and strategies to leverage their strength in numbers. Business processes that will enable bulk buys from production builders need not be overly sophisticated - just form a group of qualified buyers, settle on a builder and community and start making offers. Larger builders and bank REO's, particularly in the current marketplace, will sell at lower negotiated prices to buying groups, while medium and smaller builders may work with buying groups to achieve larger production volume while reducing their need for third party investment and financing.
In early stage projects, organizers and professional project managers may be hired to perform roles traditionally played by developers, allowing buyers to bypass developers altogether. Projects could be bid directly to building contractors (general or sub) on behalf of buyers and not on behalf of extra-intermediaries (developers). As cooperative buying systems becomes popularized and robust, project managers may be hired to mitigate developer profits and general contractor fees. In this system, organizers and project managers may work as fee paid consultants paid per project and, eventually, as employees assigned to various projects that are provided for them. For smaller projects and projects with prominent social benefits to buyers, organizers and project managers might work on a volunteer basis. In other instances, organizers and project managers may work on a fee basis, but earn fees at closing, similar to real estate and mortgage brokers.| Cooperative Auctions: 30 Second Google Contest Project Demonstration |
| Group Buying can be more rapidly facilitated via an auction strategy. |
|
|
|
|
Next page: Making Money From Home Ideas
Recommended Products
Real Ways To Make Money At Home News
15K Per Month Formula Review Webinar 5 Offline Marketing
27 Jan 2012 at 12:15am 15K Per Month Formula Review Offline Marketing In this dynamic two part series, there is a violent collision between online and offline marketing was displayed. The 15K Per Month Formula Review webinar 5 opened up with the offline marketing strategy voice broadcasting. I say offline but, in this complete detailed instruction we are taught how ...Read more...
15K Per Month Formula Review Paid Traffic Mastery Webinar 4
21 Jan 2012 at 7:46am 15K Per Month Formula Review Paid Traffic Mastery How to scale advertising online. So what is scaled advertising? Skilled advertising is a simple concept of taking a percentage of the income you earn and putting it back into your business or advertising, in this case paid advertising. David Sharpe kicks off this webinar with some ...Read more...
15K Per Month Formula Review SEO Mastery Webinar 3
10 Jan 2012 at 8:06am 15K Per Month Formula Review SEO Mastery In this 15K Per Month Formula Review I dissect a three in one SEO Mastery Webinar. Three hours again full of unbelievable content by Rob Fore, Jon Morz and Chris Rosheleau. What is it you want to know about SEO and how to do it……learn it hear. All ...Read more...
15K Per Month Formula Review Syndication Mastery Webinar 2
9 Jan 2012 at 8:03am 15K Per Month Formula Review Syndication Mastery Automated syndication is the topic of the day, the official name “15K Per Month Formula Review” Syndication Mastery Webinar 2. How to increase your traffic by four to ten times with automation. Another 3 hours of great content presented by Toby and Layla Black, Toby and Layla Black ...Read more...



